Return to New York City & Pluviose, a poem

SaturdaymorningCentralpark
Central Park not far from West Park Drive — I took the photo by cell phone on Saturday, climbing high on a rock formation around 10 in the morning, bitter cold wind but sunny: I meant to snap the lake I saw too but didn’t manage it

Dear friends and readers,

Yvette and I reached home from New York City and our pussycats not far from midnight last night (Saturday). We had come to New York City for two nights and three days (at a huge expense) for reasons we made explicit and not so explicit. We said we were coming to NYC for Yvette at long last to go into the opera house and experiences one of the operas we’d been watching in an HD-screen theater live, and since John Adams’s The Death of Klinghoffer was removed from HD operas broadcast across the world (a genuine loss) we chose this weekend. In summer we had said we ought to have a holiday but didn’t exactly know where to go, and thought of NYC but since in August NYC is hot, to say nothing of the reality the plays I’d want to see were starting in later September, we decided on some time during the fall.

I knew I was coming as a way of breaking a thick wall of pain: NYC the place Jim and I had lived in so happily (well on and off) together for 11 years and visited many times since, my home (where I feel at home, crazy as this may seem, where when my inability to cope with space as to north, south, east, and west is not so bad once I am situated since I know so many of the streets and places like I know my hands). Why I needed to do this I don’t know: twice in the two days I began to shake uncontrollably from nervous distress, and at times it seemed everywhere I went I was looking at some place or scene he and I had been together, or some place or scene he and I had passed through together and remembering, here we did this, there we would do that. But never cried. Why I don’t cry I can’t figure out, instead I sit down and put my hands over my face for the time I need to do this until I’m calmer.

So many ghosts. I grew up here with two parents, both now dead, and I went to the theater with my father. Shopped on 34th Street when it was glamorous and had an Orbach’s and got a fancy coat with my mother. They were with me too. Sombre in Central Park I went walking with Memory.

Yvette and I had saw some terrific theater and great photographs, which I mean to write blogs on Ellen and Jim have a blog two. Beyond Death of Klinghoffer, which Yvette has already written in her concise brillian wry way upon, we saw together Stoppard’s The Real Thing and went to the Metropolitan Museum for a few hours and happened upon photographs by Thomas Struth, I saw Albee’s A Delicate Balance, and walked in Central Park, both wandered in Times Square where twice we found places to eat meals we could ingest (our old standby The Olive Garden, up against the Tickets booth, still there and offering the best meal we had while we were away). We missed out on Frederick Wiseman’s “rapturous” (so saith the New Yorker) National Gallery. Nowadays PBS (which devotes time to slick cliched dramas, with all star casts and writers (Worricker) does not air Wiseman. It was down at the Film Forum (Houston Street) starting at 4 pm or so, and it didn’t fit into our tight schedule. I noticed it played in AFI in Maryland today at 4 so there is hope it may show up here yet.

We had some comical misadventures, the type that seem funny in retrospect but not lived-in experience. I worry intensely about making trains and one of these liminal journeys between here and there (actually I go into mini-panics lest we miss a train, or fail to get off a train before it starts up again), one of these transition times was at 4 pm when we left Death of Klinghoffer and the Met Opera house, and had to get back to the Park Central Hotel at 56th Street and 7th Avenue to rescue our bags (we did it by subway, then walking, then tickets) and then, armed with said bags, into a taxi, and back to 34th Street to Amtrak, rattling down 7th Avenue through Broadway and east to Madison Square Garden. As it happened we were way early for a 7 pm train, so I said let’s trade in our tickets for 6 pm, and Yvette wanted to eat! She persists in this desire of hers to eat, though she is so fussy about what she eats. So we had a hunt, and finally found a place underground at Madison Square Garden (way expensive) and then when we got back to wait for some 30 minutes, on the board was a train delay of nearly an hour. We get on finally and so does all the world: the train was now supercrowded: Yvette and I could not find two seats together walking up and down the coach and I noticed a man was sleeping over 4 seats and as he looked like a bum, people were letting him occupy 4 seats (two double chairs facing one another). Fuck it I said, and went over, and shook him slightly and pushed him off the double seat we were going to occupy across the way from him. The way I cope with possible belligerence is to get very polite, perhaps schoolmistressy, and he asked me if I were the manager of the train. I replied he has no right to more than one seat, proceed to ignore him and barge on to the two seats and we took our stuff, sat down, and plugged in to recharge our phones and ipads.

Good thing as her ticket and mine had been cancelled (!) and she would have been distressed by the conductor: it seems that if you have a two-way ticket and the conductor on the way fails to swipe the ticket right, your whole ticket is cancelled. (What kind of system is this?) Somehow I was responsible said this conductor, giving me a phone number. I had to phone on the train someone in some inaccessible place and explain; I admit she immediately guessed the problem and said she could fix it; I just had to stay on hold. Yvette hears and says give her your phone number. I do. We did not get disconnected and the ticket became valid again and could be swiped by magical computers. This guy is watching us; but we carry on sitting and talking to one another and reading. We finally get to some stop where the layover allows for getting off the train, and he is walking off the train — without his bag. Suddenly Yvette was worried, “he’s forgetting his bag!” I said he’ll just get belligerent. He is a man who drinks heavily and falls asleep, “it’s none of our business” (an old NY axiom). But I could not stop her from running after him, pushing partly through the crowded aisles, to call to him, “Sir, sir … you are forgetting your bag!”, looking all anxiety. Most unexpectedly he turns round, comes back and is all courtesy to her, genuinely touched by her apparent concern, telling her all he meant to do was walk for the fresh air and come back into the train.

We then moved to the seats across the aisle as the train was less crowded, but he offers to get me a coffee, apologizes to me in positively courtly manner. I accept his apology. He had been impressed by my willingness to sit in seats across from his where everyone else treated him like some pariah. In a couple of stations he gets off and we say “cheerio” and other polite salutations.

However, turns out Yvette was not motivated (as he and I both thought) by her good heart, but was afraid that if he left his bag we would have to report it to the conductor as possibly a terrorist bomb and then we’d be stuck on the train with interviews for hours and hours. She wasn’t thinking of him at all. I said (startled at this), “no one would report such a bag … he’s not a terrorist, just a poor man who drinks too much and his stuff looked miserable in his wretched bag.” But could not persuade her she would not have had to report it. She would have reported lest we get in trouble for not reporting it. I ask myself, Have I neglected some aspect of her education?

Shall I say that NYC does have restaurants that are neither super-expensive or dead cheap (Montreal and other cities seem to have no half-way places) but often the food is sheer snobbery. Who eats that? I mean for real? I did begin to discover some better places, a real Trattoria up two blocks from the hotel, a good cafe near the park. The subway is a mystery to me once again, but Yvette got pretty good at navigating us up and down, east and west. A new system gives the trains with letters and numbers colors so you can see at a glance which set of trains run up and down and and in and our of the same tracks at some point or other. She had not taken an heavy enough coat and was not keen on walking above ground

Caroline faithfully visited the cats daily, played with them, put down food, cleaned the litter, including much later on Thursday night and Saturday afternoon. Still they were upset. Caroline sent photos each day.

WaryClaryCat
Wary Clarycat

All day today she has stuck close to me, sitting tight on my lap, half-clutching at me with paws.

They refuse to play with dead leaves: Ian all intense uncomfortableness:

notquiteenticed

Ian went into his hugging me act by 4 this afternoon.

I don’t know if I’ll return again soon. This time took a lot out of me. I had a lot to do today too: bills, much mail to go through, catching up on my courses: I am asked to submit a proposal which will entice retired people at the OLLI program at Mason to read Trollope — I ask myself, what am I doing enticing older people to read anyone? There’s something wrong here. I even managed to go out to DC this afternoon with a friend to meet with an all-women Aspergers group at a Teaism not far from the E-Street Cinema, and share experiences and problems and how to cope.

I’ll end with poem I came across a couple of weeks ago: by John Burnside he analogously captures something of the experience I felt during the three days: on Thursday night coming home exhilarated from seeing Glenn Close’s performance in Albee’s A Delicate Balance, I had a 11 block walk in the rain with the sidewalk running rivers so it was indeed

Pluviose

There is a kind of sleep that falls
for days on end, the foothills lost in cloud,
rain in the stairwells, rainspots crossing the floor
of the Catholic church

and the sense of a former life
at the back of our minds,
as if the dead had gathered here in shapes
that seemed at least familiar, if not perfect.

As children, we were told they came
for our sakes, bringing secrets from the cold,
the loam on their eyes and hands
a kind of blessing,

but now they are here,
in the creases and lines of our mouths,
speaking through us to friends we have never seen,
or only to the rain, because it sounds

the way it sounded then, when they were young,
setting a ladle aside, or a finished book,
and the world almost come to an end,
when we stopped to listen.

Late afternoon, and further along the canal
the lock-keeper’s prettiest daughter is setting
eel traps in the clockless silt and purl
of waters her mother fished, before marriage and barter,

and though she has been dead for forty years,
she is living the life I lost on the way to school
in the body I failed to grow up in, her hands in the flow
of the river, finding the current

and teasing it loose, like a story, the word by word
oftrains running through in the dark, in a seasonless rain,
and the faces in every compartment familiar and strange,
with a sister’s disdain, or a grandmother’s folded smile.

Sylvia

Author: ellenandjim

Ellen Moody holds a Ph.D in British Literature and taught in American senior colleges for more than 40 years. Since 2013 she has been teaching older retired people at two Oscher Institutes of Lifelong Learning, one attached to American University (Washington, DC) and other to George Mason University (in Fairfax, Va). She is also a literary scholar with specialties in 18th century literature, translation, early modern and women's studies, film, nineteenth and 20th century literature and of course Trollope. For Trollope she wrote a book on her experiences of reading Trollope on the Internet with others, some more academic style essays, two on film adaptations, the most recent on Trollope's depiction of settler colonialism: "On Inventing a New Country." Here is her website: http://www.jimandellen.org/ellen/ No part of this blog may be reproduced without express permission from the author/blog owner. Linking, on the other hand, is highly encouraged!

16 thoughts on “Return to New York City & Pluviose, a poem”

  1. Ah yes, I often say that New York is a mausoleum for me – there are the tombs, er, apartment buildings, the late carapaces of dead relatives on dozens of corners. Homes that were once as vivid as cultured as those in “Fanny and Alexander,” but were struck like stage sets overnight once the people who lived in them died. The shells still stand but the people are gone. I probably know two hunded people who’ve died in the half century since I grew up in New York. Parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, great-aunts and uncles, great-great…And old school friends: plenty. So I often feel dragged down by that miasma of the dead; but then again, ironically, I know more still living people in New York than I do anywhere else on earth! They’re still triumphantly there, so happy to see me and I them, there is nothing like it. So once I get over the uneasy depression of the lost, I rush about the city in a state of exalted exhilaration. Days are spent moving every hour to a joyous meeting with another school friend, cousin, professional friend – I pack more social moments in a week in New York than I have in Los Angeles in five years. So it’s an odd mixture, and a couple of trips a year suffice…

    Not being a theatergoer I don’t do plays, but I sometimes take in the New York Ballet, and always do a few museums, plus my dearly lifelong favorite restaurants. Turkish Kitchen, Sevilla, Carmine’s, Chinatown, Ferrarra’s, Cafe Sabartsky in the Neue Gallery…many more, nothing like any of them in L.A. It’s a heady rich week and I need a vacation when I get home again! 🙂

    1. Well I don’t have all these friends to see, nor left over (as it were) relatives. When Jim was alive, once in a while we would see a dear couple, often one of them a friend I had made on the Net and corresponded with for years; once in a long while an old girlfriend from graduate school and her husband. Congenial talk, memories, catching up ensued and a wish (on my part) I might see this pair of people or friend again. Once in a while we did, but most of the time not. There was a party at the Graduate Center years ago that we went to and I met old acquaintances, caught up again. Curiosity if there was that, not much joy.

      Jim and my deepest pleasures in NYC were its cultural life not replicated elsewhere: the theater when it’s good can be very good. He liked the ballet more than I. As I’ve revealed countless times, I’m not much on reveling in food though I recognize a fine restaurant where good meeting with people is facilitated. Most of the time we were alone together. He preferred it that way.

      For he and I ion some trips we experienced, hit a bliss together that left me soaring. Sometimes looking at some picture in an exhibit together (I would have liked that Wiseman film); I remember one Poussin exhibit we returned to. This time I burst into tears at one: Thomas Struth’s photograph of a woman in the middle of a brain cancer operation. Like some sudden revelation and I asked myself what had the room looked like (wires, machines, bags of hideous liquids hanging here and there) when Jim underwent his esophagectomy. I wished I had seen that photograph before. I hoped others would and perhaps that would make them think many times before saying yes. Perhaps it should be broadcast on CNN. The little plaque assured us “at this time” the woman is doing well. Really? How so? So yes I saw something there, learned something I could not realize elsewhere.

      1. There’s so much in New York there’s room for many pleasures, be they museums and music, friends and food, the park and the High Line. Naturally we choose our individual favorite things. I suppose my New York centers more on people because I grew up there and so many of those who grew up with me are still there. A shared past is a powerful enricher of friendship. Los Angeles has no sense of the past for me even though I’ve lived here for decades – can’t really understand why.

  2. Not quarreling or meaning to debate adversely: I grew up there too, lived there until age 34 and then visited a lot over the years, lived in all boroughs. In the 1950s had a big extended family there: every single one has moved out.

    Why does my New York not center on people? I’m not good at socializing; the rigors of its unwritten rules still puzzle me. Jim came at this from another direction. That’s why to me going back might not be a solution to my loneness – which after all was him when I met him at age 22 nearly 23.

    More: he was my New York City. I had learned to dislike it intensely in many ways, especially the boroughs when I left for England. I had no plan to return or what to do next. It was with him I learned to explore the Manhattan that’s valuable, what’s worth while, with him I enjoyed it. I was doing by myself what I would have done with him but I was without him and (as we say in NYC) it was not the same. I broke a barrier to come without him and got on another side of a glass, but did not penetrate the wall or silence. In the Death of Klinghoffer there is a scene where a character confronts a wall of stone. NYC is also a stony place.

    Izzy found Times Square very nerve-wracking — too much phenomena, too much circus, no quiet refuge because most restaurants are so noisy (they blare music at you). It’s an old city, much decrepit and that’s everywhere too.

  3. Ellen, I honestly believe that you are too hard on yourself over socialising. We hit it off immediately at Exeter. I hope we have become good friends. I think that NY and getting about there makes one tense and that certainly isn’t an easy mood for socialising and making friends. You are a wonderful talker and that always is attractive.

  4. John W: “That’s one of the most moving, and, in places, funny (the man on the train is right out of Confederacy of Dunces) blog posts I’ve read in a long time. … Also, Ian and Clary are lovely!”

    Me: Oh the man reminded me of the man in Trollope’s “Spotted Dog” as he might appear to a casual passer-by.

  5. Judy L: That is so beautiful, esp moving for me, not only bc I will feel so much if ever in NYC again where Robert & visited so often…but also your wonderful cats who remind me of my two “unsettled” cats who sense my own unease so acutely, and, lastly, the exquisite poem bc it is raining here and gray. Thank you for introducing me to Burnside. I will seek him out.

    Me: And thank you for appreciating what I try to do for myself and others. I found the Burnside poem in an issue of the TLS Literary Supplement and will share them eventually too.

  6. It is a stone city and a noisy one and decrepit – overwhelming really, no matter what angle, or whatever stage in your life, you approach it from. Always glad to visit – and always glad to go home where it’s quieter.

    1. In Jim and my last years (11) in upper Manhattan, we used to sigh with relief when we got off the A train and were walking underneath Fort Tryon Park off to our apartment which faced an inner court and park by a church.

      It’s a hard place to visit but okay to live because you learn to live where you can find quiet refuge.

      I am thinking of scattering his ashes (possibly because Caroline wants to be there) at some point in the path that goes up and down the Hudson River in the park that starts on 200th Street. We would walk there frequently. One winter there were these huge pieces of ice floating down. I’ve had pictures on facebook of the Hudson by Bellows — Jim liked them too.

      1. I kind of like the sound of that…it’s a place Jim really lived and was happy, and being by the Hudson is so beautiful and historical and makes you feel contemplative…Good choice, I think! My mother lived by the Hudson for the last decade of her life, at the Hebrew Home in Riverdale, but she could only see it for the first year; after that she lost her sight, you remember. For me, what you say about needing a quiet refuge place when in New York is completely true. That’s why, when I’m not staying at stepfather’s or rabbi cousin’s, in quiet(ish) neighborhoods, I go to that little hotel in the Village. I guess you chose midtown this time because of the theater, but it could not have given you much of that quiet oasis feeling that really is kind of precious when there!

  7. And it was mucho expensive. What we didn’t think to do was take separate rooms. We will try the Larchmont next time. I would prefer to be downtown in the 20s and the Larchmont block looked just the sort of place I could retreat to.

    In a deep sense the idea of returning Jim to England is the product of this last terrible time. When he was younger, he remembered vividly all that he had hated about England. When you grow older, you grow nostalgic and the trips to the UK as an upper middle class tourist were a very different thing than as a boy, working and lower middle class. It was in NYC he knew some of his happiest hours — also some of them here in this house with me as we grew older and yet more in love (understanding as we grew older more how hard life was and how lucky we had been to find and stay together). So scattering the ashes by the Hudson is as justified. And it will make having Caroline there feasible.

  8. Well, there you are. He was young there, he was happy there, looking out at the Hudson has such a sense of history and peace. As soon as you said that it clicked: I thought, how much better than shlepping ashes to England, feeling all displaced and lost and miserable. But the Hudson is home. So easy to do.

    Thing about the Larchmont is the location – that quiet old block on 11th Street, so well located between 5th and 6th; two blocks from the 7th Avenue Subway so you can shoot easily up to theater. I always get that peaceful refuge homey feeling there, more even than in relatives’ apartments where you are in someone else’s home. The rooms are just little bed and breakfast rooms, but they’re comfortable, very quiet, and you can have TWO of them, privacy, for the price of half a midtown room!

    1. My favorite picture (in my house) is called Quiet City (a reproduction, framed lightly) and it’s of a street very like the one the Larchmont is on.

      QuietCitywithFrame

      I’d reserve early: the price for 2 rooms is half the price for 1 at the Park Central. Jim’s favorite picture is of small boats off the shore of Italy, Italian Sloops (another reproduction, framed lightly).

      ItalianSloops

      I can’t agree that going to England with the ashes is a bad idea — I would not be lost and miserable since I was going to do it with my friend, Clare, and at Torquay, which is so beautiful and which Jim and I spent a week near in a clock tower just outside Exeter, on a beach. We had much happiness in our holidays at the Landmark Trust places. When he returned as a middle class successful man he was happy there; he was English and much of his culture and deepest assumptions came from there; his saying on his urn asserts this and we met and fell in love in an English context — the early time together in Leeds was nothing less than euphoric both after we fell in love and then again after we married.

      Both options are good, but to have Caroline with us in England would take a longer trip together (&c, all that means), cost her much more. Both places are versions of deep home for him and for me. In ways Alexandria, Virginia, will never be.

      1. Yes, I see what you mean…England would be good too…only rather a to-do. It just seems so natural, by the Hudson, and having him not so far from home. But whichever way you do it, when the time’s right, I’m sure it will be beautiful and meaningful.

  9. From a friend: I read your blog about New York, and it sounded wonderful, if bewildering … The last time I took Amtrak was in the ’80s, and it was always late. In theory I support the trains, but there ARE no trains here. Our governor idiotically turned down a grant for a fast train between Des Moines and Chicago. He’s Republican, but no doubt supporting the oil business. Who could not want a fast train?

    Me: The world is indeed a scary place, very large and unforgiving. The only protection it seems is money and the right ethnicity. Republicans don’t want people to be able to reach one another, by train, bus, or on the Net. They don’t people to be educated either or have a secure job. They are succeeding in recreating US society’s institutions and transportation and economy on these terms all too easily.

Comments are closed.